"Frank's skill in asking the right questions is un-mistakable, and is at the core of his leadership philosophy.

The power of these questions cannot be underestimated, especially if you want to lead and not manage."
—John Cave
Westhaven Worldwide Logistics

If not otherwise stated—all postings © Frank D. Kanu. All rights reserved.

Posts

Stealing Stuff

At least I consider it stealing when you take things from someone else’s blog and put them in yours. I know it wasn’t the first time that Entrecarders/Bloggers have done this. What I really wonder is—how hard can it be to actually credit the person you took the stuff from?

Question Mark

Look at this question mark image. On my blog here since a long time (almost a year)—created by Ada from Scramories.

As an author copyright and copyright infringement are something that I have to be very concerned about.

If people do not stop to steal content from others—where do the original authors end up? The bad impact of splogs scoring higher than the original can already been seen anywhere.

If you are a marketer—do you really need to steal?
PS:
And removing the stolen content after being caught doesn’t make it any better.

It pretty much shows your morals and ethics towards the copyrights and content of others.

As long as you don’t get caught—you steal, right?

Tags:
 

This blog-entry is protected by a digital fingerprint:785273ed81985582c8a1be62f78c9459

Six other Opinions:

  1. Cecilia
    21:36 on Sunday, April 13th, 2008
    Interestingly enough - Ada had a posting about rippers:
    http://scramories.com/blog/2008/03/04/ripper/

    And Alan Weiss put it right: Those are low-lifes
  2. Frank Kanu
    21:40 on Sunday, April 13th, 2008
    Thank you Cecilia.

    I also have to wonder about all the others that recognize the stolen content—but never say a word.
  3. Layne | Reward Rebel
    09:27 on Monday, April 14th, 2008
    Oh, Frank, I have tried to exlain that it was a genuine error and that I thought I was adding public domain clipart.

    Yes, I’m at fault for mixing up images that someone owns with general stuff on my PC, but consider this: why would I put up a ‘stolen’ graphic when the owner visits my site, and will see it?

    I didn’t even know I’d ever been to your website (obviously, I’m familiar with your blog) and didn’t just pop over, swipe your graphic and then upload it to my site.

    I hoped you’d respond to my email, in which I tried to explain that ‘yes, I sometimes copy images around the net’, not to steal them, but to use them as inspiration for my own graphic creations. However, in future, I’ll take a screenshot to ensure that nothing like this can happen again.

    A genuine mistake over provenance has occurred. I’ve apologised most profusely and removed the offending ’stolen item’, but I don’t know what more I can do, if you won’t entertain the possibility that this occurrence is anything other than deliberate theft.

    Again, Frank, I didn’t intentionally use a graphic that was privately owned, but it seems that mistakes aren’t allowed.

    Layne | Reward Rebel
  4. Frank Kanu
    10:31 on Monday, April 14th, 2008
    Layne,

    I applaud you for apologizing - if just more would do that!

    I appreciate your apology so much that I do not have a problem with allowing your comment :)

    In general I do not have a problem when someone likes my content and uses it - as long as they point back to me. Unfortunately I see it every day that my content is stolen; that’s why I have started to act way more vigorously than I used to.

    Stolen content is not just a problem for me - it’s a problem all over the internet. A few years ago putting a big (C) over images was unthinkable - now there are sites where every image has a big copyright note over them. The amount of time and money one has to spend to protect their content has grown way out of control. (Why some think that having a feed means they can just take it beats me.)
  5. Cecilia
    11:45 on Monday, April 14th, 2008
    Layne,

    you really blow this all up, right? I read that Frank asked to have acknowledged that the image came from him. What could have been so hard to actually do that?

    Then you go on to explain that you now - afterwards - you do your due diligence. This is where the real problem lies: Too many take the internet content for granted and think just because it is there it is theirs.
  6. Ada Kanu
    14:06 on Monday, April 14th, 2008
    Like you said, the right thing to do would have been to apologize, and then give credit, not throw a big hissy fit and replace the image, that only shows the arrogance of this person to TRY to correct the situation by making it worst.

One Ping & Trackback:

  1. 11:18 on Monday, April 14th, 2008
    They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? Public Apology To Frank Kanu | Reward Rebel
    [...] You can read Frank’s feelings about the incident, and my own initial reaction, in his article, Stealing Stuff. [...]

Because I value your thoughtful opinions, I encourage you to add them.

Please leave your Response right here:




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Please do not be offended if I edit your response for clarity or to keep out questionable matters, however, and I may even delete off-topic responses.

« Are you waiting for opportunities or are you creating them?     04/14/2008 »

Navigation, Archives and Links


This blog is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.